tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post6242015161933265913..comments2023-11-05T08:35:20.183+01:00Comments on Jevopi's Developer Blog: Quick'n Dirty Tutorial on Modelling with EclipseJens v.P.http://www.blogger.com/profile/14089732885850015120noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-38326811399225987612011-03-23T13:47:26.142+01:002011-03-23T13:47:26.142+01:00@darie17: I don't think highlighting the resul...@darie17: I don't think highlighting the results of an OCL query is built in. The OCL console is "only" an example rather then a real tool. However, OCL is also built in <a href="http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMF_Search" rel="nofollow">EMFSearch</a>, which maybe comes closer to the tool you are looking for -- or at least it is a good starting point for your own development. I tutored a <aJens v.P.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14089732885850015120noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-63387510449627914942011-03-22T12:56:35.825+01:002011-03-22T12:56:35.825+01:00Hi Jens, I read your article, nice indeed.
Now a...Hi Jens, I read your article, nice indeed. <br /><br />Now a question: please take a look at Figure 5 in your article. Let's say we want to write an OCL query which returnes all the "Skill" elements of the company. We would probably write <b>Skill.allInstances()</b> in the OCL console and would get as a result 2 Skill-objects, namely <i>modelling</i> and <i>hacking</i>. Is there a Darie Moldovanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08823144220271823527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-57051256881897319532010-01-20T09:19:58.937+01:002010-01-20T09:19:58.937+01:00You didn't offend me. I just wanted to correct...You didn't offend me. I just wanted to correct your statement. And I also didn't want to be nitpicky.<br /><br />I actually think we should have at little terms as possible and as much as needed. And especially in the modeling world there are a lot of unimportant terms.<br /><br />But :-) I talk to people about this stuff day by day, and you wouldn't believe how often we confuse the Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11751196715155150517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-10557075462475928982010-01-19T22:03:18.609+01:002010-01-19T22:03:18.609+01:00@Sven: Oh, I'm so sorry. I didn't meant to...@Sven: Oh, I'm so sorry. I didn't meant to offend you (or the Xtext team).<br /><br />Of course, a DSL is not a model. Hmm... according to the metamodel hierarchy, a model is an instance of a meta-model. So, if a model is an instance of a language (according to your comment), it seems as if a language is a meta-model, isn't it? And a meta-model is a model, so it seems as if a DSL is aJens v.P.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14089732885850015120noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-6349417391252563252010-01-19T20:31:50.077+01:002010-01-19T20:31:50.077+01:00Thanks for this post Jens. This is one of the best...Thanks for this post Jens. This is one of the best introductions I've seen to the benefits of the Eclipse Modeling ecosystem.Chris Aniszczyk (zx)https://www.blogger.com/profile/14067673601779593093noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-47800062567104666952010-01-19T20:19:11.652+01:002010-01-19T20:19:11.652+01:00"""In Xtext, a model is called a DS..."""In Xtext, a model is called a DSL."""<br /><br />The language is not the model. A model is an instance of a language.<br /><br />"""Experts like to use different names for "model", sometimes it's cooler to call a model "meta-model" (or, even cooler, "meta-meta-model"),"""<br /><br />:-) Sometimes it&#Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11751196715155150517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-20960227996315925232010-01-19T18:53:31.705+01:002010-01-19T18:53:31.705+01:00@Lars: Yes, of course! Grammar is now available as...@Lars: Yes, of course! Grammar is now available as text (see below Fig. 6).Jens v.P.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14089732885850015120noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4884093826755448868.post-17347143007440225262010-01-19T17:21:59.323+01:002010-01-19T17:21:59.323+01:00Hi Jens,
thanks, this is very good. One improveme...Hi Jens,<br /><br />thanks, this is very good. One improvement suggestion: it would be nice if you could make the xtext grammer available as text and not only as screenshot.Lars Vogelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15780848976283335301noreply@blogger.com